EMOTIONAL
REACTIONS
I write this note in continuation my earlier one on
SURYANELLI CASE, the most discussed news in all the visual and print
media. The general public reaction on
sudden impulses and the emotional expressions, go beyond limits unchecked,
leading to disastrous situations.
The recent judgement on the reported case under
investigation & trial for the past 17 years have finally given rise to controversial opinions from different sources . Most of the people who comments on the case
and the judgement may not be aware of the sequential stages of evidences and
information that lead to the disposal of the case by the high court. Superficial
knowledge and information may not give the correct picture of an incident that
happened long back. The team of officers
and investigating authorities might have gone into threadbare details of the
case and submitted to the legal authorities for their final decision. The Rule of Law is the final word in any case
that is referred to the Judiciary.
After going through the visual discussions and
statements of men & women from all walks of life, I have a feeling that we
must try to answer the following queries before we comment upon the present
status of the case.
1. What
was the life style of the girl in her school days?
2. Was
there any threat from people to molest her sexually?
3. Did
she go out of the house with her boy friend with or without the knowledge of
her parents? If the answer is NO was there any complaint lodged by her parents
to the local police?
4. Did
anybody take her by force from her house?
5. Did
the girl inform her parents during the long absence from home?
All these queries are to be answered, after going
through the girl’s past history, by the protesters before directly coming into
action, by way of protest against the investigating officers or the Judge. The
silence for the past 8 years or so does not reveal any special nature of this
crime brought forth by any of the agencies finding fault with the legal aspects
in pronouncing the judgement in this case..
The judges after going through the case with all available
evidences and statements of the witnesses arrived at a decision (without any
speculation or preconceived ideas or forecasts), as is normally done by any
other Judicial authority. Human “error of judgement” may come up in any
level of official action by appropriate authorities and there are solutions to
rectify the error without prejudice to anyone.
But without
patience to hear the factual position, if public agitation is mooted out
, then things will go to an uncontrollable level on account of the mob psychology .. Ill
conceived reactions by public in such situations must be checked by the Leaders
of different organisations to settle the issues amicably without any “strings
attached”. Deliberate and un-whole-some remarks by men in authority, unless
checked by self control, things will go out of reach and damage the tranquillity
of social life..
Abraham Mangalath Philip
No comments:
Post a Comment